Kintz to attend graduate program in speech-language pathology next fall

Photograph of Jane Kintz

Jane Kintz

Jane Kintz, a linguistics major graduating this year, has been accepted to the MS program in speech-language pathology at San José State University and plans on attending in the fall. The WHASC Editor sat down with Jane after the good news to talk about her experience at UC Santa Cruz and her future career.

WHASC Editor: How did you decide to go into speech pathology?

Kintz: I’ve had a passion for languages for many years. While I was living in South Korea studying Korean, I was teaching English to young children and older adults. I realized during that time that although I loved studying languages, I felt most fulfilled sitting with people and helping them develop their ability to communicate and ultimately leaving a lasting impact on people’s lives. Speech pathology is this beautiful area where you use your linguistic knowledge to help improve the quality of people’s lives.

WHASC Editor: How do you think the Linguistics major prepared you for applying and getting accepted to the MS program at SJSU?

Kintz: Being a linguistics major prepared me in a lot of ways. The emphasis on development of critical thinking skills and writing clear analytical essays prepared me for the heavy writing portion of the application process. These skills helped me write a clear, concise and compelling personal statement, which is of major consideration for the program. Also, the content in linguistics classes have direct application to the program. This gives me an interdisciplinary advantage that allows me to bring different perspectives to the program, which I believe helped me get accepted.

WHASC Editor: Do you have a favorite linguistics class? What was it and why?

Kintz: It’s a tie between Phonology 2 and Phonetics 2. I loved Phonology because it almost felt like solving puzzles. And I loved Phonetics because I really enjoyed analyzing spectrograms and learning about sound production.

WHASC Editor: What will you miss most about UCSC?

Kintz: The redwoods for sure. But truly the entire linguistics department, faculty and students. To be in a program with professors and students who are both passionate about the field and deeply curious has been such a gift. I am so grateful for my time here, and UCSC will always hold a special place in my heart.

Best of luck in your future pursuits, Jane!

Jed Pizarro-Guevara receives NSF Postdoctoral Fellowship

Jed

Jed Pizarro-Guevara

Jed Pizarro-Guevara, who received his PhD from UCSC in 2020, has been awarded a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the National Science Foundation. During the two-year fellowship, he will continue as a member of Professor Brian Dillon’s psycholinguistics lab at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Jed’s dissertation, When human universal meets language specific, was advised by Professor Matt Wagers. His work focuses on sentence processing in a variety of languages, most significantly Tagalog. Check out a description of the project, as well as related project he’s working on, below:

 

My current project (NSF SPRF #2204112) looks at reflexive processing in Tagalog: when Tagalog comprehenders interpret reflexives in real-time, to what extent do they attend to potential antecedents that are not licensed by the grammar? What types of linguistic information do they leverage to guide their interpretation? I’ll be using the visual world paradigm to investigate these questions. I’m currently running large-scale interpretation studies that look at the binding possibilities of reflexive pronouns in the language. These interpretation studies will form the empirical backbone of the visual world studies that I’ll be deploying  at the University of the Philippines Diliman later this year (probably around August/September) and the year after (most likely around the same time). I haven’t been back since summer 2019, so I’m super excited about this research trip. I also get to take a grad student RA with me to assist with data collection. That should be fun! I can’t wait to introduce them to the wonderful people (and food!!) over there! 😄

 

Sort of related to this project is a collaboration I have with Özge Bakay. We’re conceptually replicating Dillon et al. 2013, which used eye-tracking while reading to compare interference effects in English subject-verb and anaphoric dependencies. This is particularly exciting for me because first, I get to work with undergrads again! They’re helping us make the visual world counterpart of the Dillon et al study. Second, we’ll be collecting data using an in-lab eye-tracker and a more portable eye-tracker, like the one that Matt and Maziar have used in z/lab [sentence processing work on Zapotec]! There’s obvious differences between the two (e.g., price, sampling rate, etc.), so we wanted to do an explicit comparison to see how qualitatively similar/comparable the data will be. We will begin data collection this Spring semester (or at least that’s the goal), so stay tuned!
Congrats, Jed!

Interview with Professor Mia Gong

Last week, the WHASC Editor talked with Mia Gong, who just joined the Department as an Assistant Professor.

Professor Mia Gong

Professor Mia Gong

Professor Gong received the PhD in 2022 from Cornell University. Her research, which is in theoretical syntax and the syntax-morphology interface, aims to account for structural variation and typological parallels across languages. It is characterized by a strong commitment to fieldwork, in particular to two Mongolic languages: Dagur and Chakhar Mongolian. Her work has appeared or will soon appear in Linguistic Inquiry and Glossa.

WHASC Editor: How did you get into linguistics?

Gong: I took my first linguistics class in the form of an introductory syntax class while I was studying for my Master’s degree at the University of Delaware. Despite having a rather late start in linguistics, I was immediately drawn to the subject and soon afterwards I decided to pursue linguistics as a career. With the encouragement of my advisors I decided to leave UD to pursue a PhD in linguistics. After moving to Cornell, I had a lot of fun exploring typologically different languages and developed a more general interest in languages of East/Central Asia. 

WHASC Editor: What is a project that you are currently working on?

Gong: One of my current projects is on the same-subject/different-subject constructions in Mongolic languages, which superficially resembles the switch-reference system found in many American languages. I am very excited to be working with native speakers of different Mongolian dialects to test out several hypotheses for this project over the next few weeks. 

WHASC Editor: What is a big question in your subdiscipline that excites you, and why?

Gong: I’ve always been interested in the problems of descriptive and explanatory adequacy. For example, how can our theory be constructed in a way so that it correctly describes the tacit competence of native speakers, while simultaneously providing a principled explanation (independent of any particular language) for the selection of the descriptively adequate grammar? To what extent does our current theory of language qualify as a genuine explanation? While these are familiar problems, they help remind me why I entered the field of linguistics and have always grounded me and kept me going. 

WHASC Editor: What is the most interesting thing you have seen/done/learned about in Santa Cruz so far?

Gong: I would say the nature. I have never lived in a place like Santa Cruz before, and it’s always great to be walking on campus and see the early morning/twilight mist.

We are excited to have you as a member of the Department, Mia!

Interview with Professor Christian Ruvalcaba

Professor Ruvalcaba

Professor Christian Ruvalcaba

The WHASC Editor got a chance recently to sit down with Christian Ruvalcaba, who joined the Department of Languages and Applied Linguistics this fall as an Assistant Professor. 

Professor Ruvalcaba received the PhD in 2018 from the University of Arizona, and his research investigates morphosyntactic theory, intersections of place identity and language, participatory sociolinguistic research in the southwest, and Indigenous language reconstruction and revitalization. While at Arizona, he coordinated the Language Capital Project, an interactive map of resource centers for speakers of minority languages in Tucson, among other collaborative projects.

WHASC Editor: How did you get into linguistics?

Ruvalcaba: I think I became interested in language as a kid. I grew up in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands where there is a lot of language contact, not just between Spanish and English, but also with Indigenous languages. In Sonora, I attended a bilingual school called Instituto Americano. Bilingual education is common in northern Mexico, and it stems back to the English schools that were set up to educate American children in the decades where Americans took over the region and its industries (mining, railroads, cattle). Despite attending bilingual school, I did not speak English when my family migrated to the US in 1994, and I was put into ESL (at that time, they were using the “pull-out” ESL model). In later years, my sister and I translated for our parents, and I had to learn to read in Spanish on my own. Even though this environment forces you to be constantly aware of language, at the time I wasn’t aware that you could learn about it in school or make a career out of it. In trying to develop my Spanish literacy, I read fiction and poetry from different Latin-American countries. Based on these interests, I decided that I wanted to study literature and philosophy, and I took classes in Irish and British literature at a community college in southern Arizona (unfortunately, there were no Mexican, borderlands, or Chicano literature classes available). Although I really enjoyed these classes, I still wanted to get a deeper understanding of the language structures themselves. Later, I took a class on language and logic, and the instructor told me that I could continue studying similar topics at the University of Arizona (the closest university to the town I lived in). He said that some of his students who had enjoyed the language and logic course went and on to major in linguistics. That was the first time I heard about the field. When I transferred to the university, I switched my focus to linguistics and philosophy. 

WHASC Editor: What is a project that you are currently working on?

Ruvalcaba: There are a couple, and one of them is on the syntax of clausal possession constructions in English. I’m trying to finish an article on this topic based on an analysis developed in my dissertation. A more applied project is related to the revitalization of the Opata languages, specifically Teguima. This is a language that was traditionally spoken in Sonora and Arizona. According to some Mexican scholars, there have been no speakers of the language since the early (or mid) 20th century. Nevertheless, the language has influenced local varieties and is commonly found in local place names. A binational group of people who identify as Opatas or descendants of Opata are trying to recover their language and customs, and the majority of the information about the language comes from archival resources. This includes a description of the language written by the Jesuit priest Natal Lombardo, which was first published in 1702, religious texts, wordlists, and subsequent analyses based on these texts. I am working with a graduate candidate from UT Austin, Michael Everdell, to assist in these efforts by helping folks access relevant resources and files. We have identified a lot of relevant material at the Bancroft Library, so I’m hoping to find ways of making these available to the group I’m working with. I’m hoping to meet students and faculty at UCSC who are interested in collaborating on this project. 

WHASC Editor: What is a big question in your subdiscipline that excites you, and why?

Ruvalcaba: This is a tough question! I’m not sure if this is a really big question, maybe more of an intersection, but the connection between language and space is very exciting to me. Most of my interests seem to stem from or gravitate to this intersection. In other words, how does language represent space (or location, place, paths etc)? How are these constructions extended to more abstract domains, such as possession and experience? Also, how does language contribute to the identity of a place, to the narratives that are associated with it, to its senses of belonging or exclusion? The latter question is also tied to notions of language and power, which has its own very exciting lines of inquiry (particularly in the context of heritage languages). 

WHASC Editor: What is the most interesting thing you have seen/done/learned about in Santa Cruz so far?

Ruvalcaba: I’ve only been here 3 months, so I haven’t gotten a chance to see or do that much. But just seeing and exploring the natural landscape around here has been so interesting, especially coming from the southwest. If I had to pick one thing, I would have to say the fog. I have never experienced or seen anything like it before.  

Welcome to the linguistics community at Santa Cruz, Christian!

Student Spotlight: Delaney Gomez-Jackson

Continuing the trend, the WHASC Editor has interviewed another of the newer members of the department: this time, Delaney Gomez-Jackson, a student in the BA/MA program.

WHASC Editor:  So you’re from the South Bay. How would you define that identity? Do you specifically identify as someone from San Jose, or as more of a general Bay Area Native?

Delaney: I would define the South Bay area identity as very tech-oriented — Santa Clara County, in particular. Depending on who I’m talking with, I’ll tell people I’m from Silicon Valley (which I think registers more with people than saying San Jose/Santa Clara) or from “near San Francisco.” Ultimately, I think my identity aligns more with a sort of general Bay Area identity.

WHASC Editor: During our interview, you mentioned a sort of “South Bay English.” Could you tell us a bit more about that? Is it a distinct thing? And what’s the place of “hella” in that variety?

Delaney: Aside from maybe tech-related terms, I think South Bay Area English is part of a general Bay Area English, which has unique lexical items compared to other California Englishes. One of the more well-known Bay Area words is “hella,” which has become pretty integrated into most California Englishes.

WHASC Editor: So you mentioned during our interview that you started off as a literature major. Could you tell us a bit more about how you came to linguistics? Was there a particular moment, or set of moments, that led you down this path?

Delaney: While I was applying to undergrad here as a Literature major, I was taking an advanced literature class in high school and realized the major wouldn’t be a good fit for me. I changed my major to Linguistics before starting my first quarter as an undergrad without really knowing what linguistics entailed besides “studying languages.” After I took Intro to Linguistics, I was intrigued by the different areas of study I could explore within the major. I really started enjoying linguistics when I took Semantics I the following quarter; I was taking it concurrently with a logic class, so maybe I was especially drawn to a concentration in semantics! My decision to declare Linguistics as my major was solidified after I survived Syntax I, and since those pivotal quarters, I’ve been interested in the syntax-semantics interface.

WHASC Editor: Finally, the quintessential closer: with the first year of classes under your belt, what’s the advice that you’d give to the incoming class of graduate students?

Delaney: The workload of your first year is intense, and it’s easy to feel burnt out by being so preoccupied with it. Do everything you can to dedicate one full, weekend day to yourself. Get to know Santa Cruz and the other folks in your cohort!

WHASC Profile: Sarah Amador

Last August, Sarah Arantza Amador joined Linguistics as our new Department Manager. Sarah came to us most immediately from Community Studies, but she’s brought us over a decade of experience from her career here at UCSC, with roles in Stevenson, Merrill, Politics, LALS, MCD Bio and EEB, spanning undergraduate teaching, graduate advising and program management.

We recently had the opportunity to sit down with Sarah and pose to her the WHASC Questionnaire (which, the Editors aver, ranks somewhere below Andy Warhol’s but probably above James Lipton’s).

Joining Linguistics, in the Humanities Division, represents a kind of homecoming for you. (Before completing the M.A. at NYU, Sarah earned the B.A. at UCSC in 2005, in Literature and in Philosophy, with Honors). What has changed or surprised you?
I’m a UCSC Humanities alumna and Stevensonian (Maria has a pretty good view of my old dorm room from her office window!), and when I joined Linguistics last August, I was surprised by how good it felt to come back to Stevenson. Stevenson Academic feels like home, and everyone in our department and division has been so welcoming. A nice change: I’m happy to see that the “smokers’ bench” at the southeast corner of our building has been replaced with a patch of wildflowers.
In the Fall Quarter, you made a pretty special journey to Iceland. What took you there, and what did you do?
I went to Iceland for a writing retreat with fellow flash fiction writers who I’d only had the pleasure of working with online previously – it was wonderful! Afterwards, my partner Richard and I spent another week eating cinnamon buns, stocking up on Icelandic novels and wool, and chasing sheep and the aurora. We drove six hours through snow and black ice to visit the Icelandic Museum of Sorcery and Witchcraft in a remote corner of the island — it was a dream!
What’s on your horizon in 2022? Any more trips, special projects, or things you’d like to try?
Knitting sweaters, finishing my novel by the end of the year, and visiting my family and friends in Spain, if COVID allows.
Sarah Amador by the Öxarárfoss Waterfall in Þingvellir National Park, Iceland

She did go chasing waterfalls: Öxarárfoss, in Þingvellir National Park